Some of the signed cards ...? Fake suspected of Pokeka, which was a highly successful bid for Pokeka, the assumed damage is on millions of dollars.

last year,"Pokemon card gameThe product that is considered to be a prototype card was traded at a high price, but in some of themRecently printed fakeSuspicionIs emerging by a user survey.

The test card is "2024 made" ...? A thorough investigation of suspicion

A collection owned by Takemi Akabane, one of the developers of Pokemon Card Game, and a prototype version of a prototype version used in the pre -release play test, was exhibited at an auction, and overseas collectors have purchased it. I did it.

However, allegedly a recent fake printed of those rare cards is the user of EliteFourum.pfmHe pointed out. If the card is fake, the damage is expected to be millions of dollars in total.

PFM has given the results of the "metadata used in color prints" as a basis for fake. It is said that most manufacturers printers may add a yellow dot metadata in a size that is not visible to the naked eye during printing.

Although the patterns generated by printer manufacturers, etc. are different, the dot pattern called "Xerox Doccolor" describes the date and time printed, and the successful prototype card card has this dot pattern. You can see it.

When this dot pattern was analyzed by the decoder, I found a metadata that was printed in June 2024. This pattern has also been found from signed cards that have won the top evaluation "10" in the grading of "CGC" that performs the card appraisal.

Distributed feeling for CGC ... Comment on "Details in the near future"

PFM is a fan site of "Pokeka"PokeBeachHe commented, "I know this, I'm really disappointed. It was cool to be able to own a part of history rather than financially ... I'm sorry."

In addition, users have a strong distrust of the CGC, which are evaluated, such as the authentication process. CGC has recognized the questions for this inquiry and is currently investigating. I will comment on the details soon.